|
LovinCosmetics (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this is so like the book!
LovinCosmetics (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Thats true!
dropsofmusic (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
lol i agree tolerable i should using it in the real world n c what follows=ehhh lol
karma212 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
For all the people complaining of who is not beautiful enough to play whoever: you must remember our Hollywood-ized version of beauty and what was considered beauty back then are very different. For one, skinny was out. It was preferable to have meat, breasts and curves.
karma212 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Secondly what constituted as a pretty girl was one who was dressed in the latest fashions in both hair and clothing had a very nice complexion and the perfect tiny lips. You see by looking well put together you were at average a pretty girl. And this is a time when natural beauty was preferred over makeup. And it's not like MAC was around the corner anyways.
karma212 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The Jane in this version is perfect because if you look on book covers and paintings of the Napoleonic or Regency era SHE (Jane) resembles how those women looked.
kansasme (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think a lot of times, which version is preferred is the one seen first. This version follows the book(including what the characters supposedly looked like) the best, due to length, probably. I actually liked Bridget Jones' Diary over the Knightly version. Colin Firth, in the role of Darcy, again, would be the reason.
arikaaa (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The 2005 version is so much better to me!
ambera15 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
How is she beautiful ? She is FAT !!!! I preferred Keira Knightley.
highschool1239 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
" she is tolerable I suppose, but not handsome enough to temp me!" one of my favorite lines- but it's so harsh!! lol |
